白色物质 正片

分类：剧情片 地区：法国年份：2009

主演：伊莎贝尔·于佩尔,伊萨赫·德·班克尔,克里斯多弗·兰伯特,尼古拉斯·迪佛休尔,WilliamNad..

导演：克莱尔·德尼

更新：2023-07-07 23:02

简介：西非尚处于后殖民时代，法国政府急于想从非洲大陆抽身。虽然士..西非尚处于后殖民时代，法国政府急于想从非洲大陆抽身。虽然士兵仓皇撤退，但是他们并没有放过玛利亚（伊莎贝尔•于佩尔IsabelleHuppert饰）的种植园，因为传闻叛军头目——拳击手（伊萨赫•德•班克尔IssachDeBankole饰）就藏身于此。战火被引到了这里，但却赶上咖啡丰收的时刻。玛利亚手下的黑人雇工为了躲避战乱，逃匿得无影无踪。而当初与玛利亚共筑非洲梦的前夫安德烈（克里斯托弗•兰伯特ChristopherLambert饰），早已另有新欢。安德烈娶了当地黑人女子，还生养了孩子，并准备偷偷卖掉种植园。家园危在旦夕，玛利亚赫然发现好吃懒做的独生子曼努埃尔（尼古拉斯•迪富修尔NicholasDuvauchelle饰）剃了光头，骑着摩托车，叫嚷着要加入叛军。灼热的土地上，似乎只剩下玛利亚她一个人在战斗……©豆瓣{if:"The first question is, “Why did she stay?”, followed by, “How would she stay?” It’s perhaps easier to analyze by exclusions: Jean-Marie did NOT stay for political reasons; nor for profit; nor for love of the land or culture (as Dinesen professed to be). In fact, Marie didn’t seem to be capable of sentimentalism, let alone living and dying for it.Clues? “Your father said happiness is not enough for me.”“I am a good fighter, too. How could I show courage in France? It would be absurd; no rhyme or reason. I’d slacken off, get too comfortable.”These are not the finest examples of eloquence by any measure. But one can hardly articulate better, such being the revelation of the private psycology of colonialism.It is not defiance, nor ennui; it is more like some sort of wounded pride, or possessiveness, or hauteur. Or a despair at one’s own fitness to live anywhere else. Is that the quintessence of colonialism? If it is, according to the film-maker, then we are really witnessing an author’s empathetic greatness. The attitude is difficult yet not alien, not off-putting. The thing you can indeed fault the French characters is that they had no imagination apart from a vague animalistic awareness of danger and opportunities. This lack of imagination insulated them and ultimately destroyed them.What does Denis try to tell about Jean-Marie through her family? Was Manual supposed to be the decadent, deadbeat offshoots of colonialism losing its mojo? What did the black man mean when he said, “You botched it with him; you didn’t finish the job” – is that a metaphor for colonialism at the end of its tether? And why did Andre stay? Was he shamed into staying by Marie?Very disciplined camerawork, directing a viewer’s line of sight and perspective’ almost bossy. The tempo of the movie is great. The languour of the landscape and climate contrasts most poignantly with the graphic, gratuitous violence."<>"" && "The first question is, “Why did she stay?”, followed by, “How would she stay?” It’s perhaps easier to analyze by exclusions: Jean-Marie did NOT stay for political reasons; nor for profit; nor for love of the land or culture (as Dinesen professed to be). In fact, Marie didn’t seem to be capable of sentimentalism, let alone living and dying for it.Clues? “Your father said happiness is not enough for me.”“I am a good fighter, too. How could I show courage in France? It would be absurd; no rhyme or reason. I’d slacken off, get too comfortable.”These are not the finest examples of eloquence by any measure. But one can hardly articulate better, such being the revelation of the private psycology of colonialism.It is not defiance, nor ennui; it is more like some sort of wounded pride, or possessiveness, or hauteur. Or a despair at one’s own fitness to live anywhere else. Is that the quintessence of colonialism? If it is, according to the film-maker, then we are really witnessing an author’s empathetic greatness. The attitude is difficult yet not alien, not off-putting. The thing you can indeed fault the French characters is that they had no imagination apart from a vague animalistic awareness of danger and opportunities. This lack of imagination insulated them and ultimately destroyed them.What does Denis try to tell about Jean-Marie through her family? Was Manual supposed to be the decadent, deadbeat offshoots of colonialism losing its mojo? What did the black man mean when he said, “You botched it with him; you didn’t finish the job” – is that a metaphor for colonialism at the end of its tether? And why did Andre stay? Was he shamed into staying by Marie?Very disciplined camerawork, directing a viewer’s line of sight and perspective’ almost bossy. The tempo of the movie is great. The languour of the landscape and climate contrasts most poignantly with the graphic, gratuitous violence."<>"暂时没有网友评论该影片"}The first question is, “Why did she stay?”, followed by, “How would she stay?” It’s perhaps easier to analyze by exclusions: Jean-Marie did NOT stay for political reasons; nor for profit; nor for love of the land or culture (as Dinesen professed to be). In fact, Marie didn’t seem to be capable of sentimentalism, let alone living and dying for it.Clues? “Your father said happiness is not enough for me.”“I am a good fighter, too. How could I show courage in France? It would be absurd; no rhyme or reason. I’d slacken off, get too comfortable.”These are not the finest examples of eloquence by any measure. But one can hardly articulate better, such being the revelation of the private psycology of colonialism.It is not defiance, nor ennui; it is more like some sort of wounded pride, or possessiveness, or hauteur. Or a despair at one’s own fitness to live anywhere else. Is that the quintessence of colonialism? If it is, according to the film-maker, then we are really witnessing an author’s empathetic greatness. The attitude is difficult yet not alien, not off-putting. The thing you can indeed fault the French characters is that they had no imagination apart from a vague animalistic awareness of danger and opportunities. This lack of imagination insulated them and ultimately destroyed them.What does Denis try to tell about Jean-Marie through her family? Was Manual supposed to be the decadent, deadbeat offshoots of colonialism losing its mojo? What did the black man mean when he said, “You botched it with him; you didn’t finish the job” – is that a metaphor for colonialism at the end of its tether? And why did Andre stay? Was he shamed into staying by Marie?Very disciplined camerawork, directing a viewer’s line of sight and perspective’ almost bossy. The tempo of the movie is great. The languour of the landscape and climate contrasts most poignantly with the graphic, gratuitous violence.{end if}详情